judge ELIPE DHARMARAO not shown the value perqusite in form 16 and tax evasion made

chennai high court judge  ELIPE DHARMARAO not shown the value perqusite availed like rent free residence, free furnishing items, current consumption charges paid by Pay and accounts office, high court, chennai in his form 16 for financial year 2010-11 and 2011-12. in form 16 in space provided 1(b) value of perquisites under section 17(2)not written/ entered/filled. there was tax evasion made by the justice Dharma RAO. and also per only only 10,000/- units of current consumption eliglible for reimbursement, but more than that pay and accounts office, high court, chennai. paying bill. at present there was arrear charges for eb more rs.78,000/-

judge ELIPE DHARMARAO not shown the value perqusite availed and tax evasion

chennai high court judge ELIPE DHARMARAO not shown the value perqusite availed like rent free residence, free furnishing items, current consumption charges paid by Pay and accounts office, high court, chennai in his form 16 for financial year 2010-11 and 2011-12. in form 16 in space provided 1(b) value of perquisites under section 17(2)not written/ entered/filled. there was tax evasion made by the justice Dharma RAO. and also per only only 10,000/- units of current consumption eliglible for reimbursement, but more than that pay and accounts office, high court, chennai. paying bill. at present there was arrear charges for eb more rs.78,000/-

chennai judges consuming current more than 10000units

chennai judges consuming current more than 10000units and payment made by office of pay and accounts office, high court campus, ch-102. as per rule current consumption has pay by judges. after paying bill, judges can get reimbursement for maximum 10,000/- units only per annum. http://tneb.tnebnet.org/newlt/menu3.html with help above below link you can view bimonthly current consumption units by individual judges. please select region has 1. chennai north and type consumer for e.g. 209.087.175 documents under Right to information

justice chandru objected to disclose the income tax returns and form 16for my RTI application

justice chandru objected to disclose the income tax returns and form 16for my RTI application. I having copy of form 16 of all judges of Chennai high court. Income tax evasion done. source RTI

items were missing from supreme court judges bungalow in new delhi, when vaciting .

items were missing from supreme court judges bungalow, other offical in new delhi.cost paid

tANSPARENCY IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA AND CHENNAI HIGH COURT IS ZERO.

FORM 16 OF CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSIONER, TAMILNADU INFORMATION COMMISSIONER, fORMER TAMILNADU CHIEF MININSTER Mr.KARUNDHI AND DY CM STALIN WERE SUPPLIED BY THE PIO AND APPEALLATE AUTHORITY, WHEVER SUPREME COURT OF INDIA AND HIGH COURT OF CHENNAI REFUSING TO SUPPLY COPY OF FORM 16 OF JUDGES. BOTH COURT DOES NOT WANT TRANSPARENCY AND THEY DONOT WANT GIVE INFORMATION TO COMMON PUBLIC. BECAUSE THEY TOP MOST PERSON IN INDIA. INDIA WAS FULL OF CORRUPT JUDGES, POLITICAN AND BURECRAFIT. TANSPARENCY IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA AND CHENNAI HIGH COURT IS ZERO. ALL INFORMATION REGARDING JUDGES, STAFF OF COURTS ARE PERSONAL AS PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICERR AND APPELATE AUTHORITY. NO INFORMATION WAS AVAILABLE REGARDING pERSONAL INFORMATION IN THE SUPREME COURT AND CHENNAI HIGH COURT INFORMED BY THE PUBLIC INFORMATION. BUT NOW CLAIMING PERSONAL.

pio OF MADRAS HIGH COURT AND SUPREME COURT REFUSED TO FURNISH COPY OF FORM-16 OF CJI AND OTHER JUDGES OF MADRAS HIGH COURT AND SUPREME COURT

1. Kindly supply copy of form no.16 under TDS issued to Income tax department in respect of Madras high court Chief justices and other judges for last five years. . Kindly supply copy of form no.16 under TDS issued to Income tax department in respect of Supreme court Chief justices of india and judges for last five years. pio OF MADRAS HIGH COURT AND SUPREME COURT REFUSED TO FURNISH COPY OF FORM-16 OF CJI AND OTHER JUDGES OF MADRAS HIGH COURT AND SUPREME COURT.